Bill Heath

11 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,124 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay
  2. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,496 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis
  3. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
  4. Labor Board v. Fainblatt

    306 U.S. 601 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    Upholding NLRA under Commerce Power
  5. Santa Cruz Co. v. Labor Board

    303 U.S. 453 (1938)   Cited 166 times
    In Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 303 U.S. 453, 58 S.Ct. 656, 82 L.Ed. 954, the employer was engaged in California in the business of canning and packing fruit and vegetables, and 37% of its pack was, by the employer, shipped out of California and sold in other States and foreign countries.
  6. Labor Board v. Newport News Co.

    308 U.S. 241 (1939)   Cited 119 times
    Upholding finding of domination where company determined structure of organization and could choose whether to adopt recommendations
  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Baltimore T. Co.

    140 F.2d 51 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore T. Co., 4 Cir., 140 F.2d 51, the court alluded with apparent approval to the fact that the Board had endeavored to avoid making its sanctions operate retroactively.
  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Townsend

    185 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1950)   Cited 30 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Townsend, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 378, this court found jurisdiction in respect to the activities of a local Hudson automobile dealer where it appeared that while the respondent, operating at Santa Maria, California, purchased all of his new automobiles from the Hudson Sales Corporation at Los Angeles, yet the latter organization shipped all of such automobiles into the State from outside points.
  9. Williams Motor Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    128 F.2d 960 (8th Cir. 1942)   Cited 15 times
    In Williams Motor Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 128 F.2d 960, under its contract the dealer was compelled to make arrangements for selling and servicing cars throughout an interstate territory covering parts of three states.
  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Henry Levaur, Inc.

    115 F.2d 105 (1st Cir. 1941)   Cited 11 times

    No. 3579. October 25, 1940. Writ of Certiorari Denied January 20, 1941. See 61 S.Ct. 550, 85 L.Ed. ___. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order issued against Henry Levaur, Incorporated, and others. Petition granted, and decree directed to be entered enforcing order. Alvin J. Rockwell, of Washington, D.C. (Charles Fahy, Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Mortimer B. Wolf, and Lewis