5 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,033 times 66 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.
360 U.S. 203 (1959) Cited 57 timesConcluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"
N.L.R.B. v. Ideal Laundry Dry Cleaning Co.
372 F.2d 307 (10th Cir. 1967) Cited 3 timesNo. 7381. February 2, 1967. Peter Giesey, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for petitioner. John K. Pickens, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, HILL, Circuit Judge, and KERR, District Judge. MURRAH, Chief Judge. When this case was here in 10 Cir., 330 F.2d 712, we declined to enforce the Board's order because in determining the appropriate bargaining unit it had in our view
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Norfolk S. Bus
159 F.2d 516 (4th Cir. 1947) Cited 11 timesNo. 5521. December 30, 1946. Writ of Certiorari Denied March 31, 1947. See 67 S.Ct. 1085. On petition for enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Norfolk Southern Bus Corporation to enforce an order of the Board. Order enforced. Louis Newman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushien, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel,