Bedding, Curtain & Drapery Workers Union

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills

    339 U.S. 563 (1950)   Cited 132 times
    Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"
  2. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949)   Cited 156 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"
  3. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gaynor News Co.

    197 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 45 times
    In Gaynor it was conceded that the sole criterion for extra payments was union membership, and the vacation payments were admittedly gratuitous.
  4. Red Star Exp. Lines v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    196 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 34 times
    In Red Star Express Lines v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 196 F.2d 78, the court condemned the contract although the so-called general savings clause provided that any specific provision which was even "affected" by Taft-Hartley was to be without effect.
  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Union

    194 F.2d 698 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 31 times
    Ignoring of prior action before a Wisconsin state agency
  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. F.H. McGraw Co.

    206 F.2d 635 (6th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times

    No. 11778. June 4, 1953. Petitions for Modification and Rehearing Denied July 7, 1953. Joseph Lotterman, New York City, for respondents. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Dean E. Denlinger, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Wheeler Marshall, Paducah, Ky., and Lotterman Tepper, New York City, on brief; James G. Wheeler, Paducah, Ky., Ralph R. Weiser, New York City, of counsel, for

  7. Colonie Fibre Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    163 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1947)   Cited 15 times
    In Colonie Fibre Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 163 F.2d 65, which turned upon a provision making the closed-shop agreement effective some eight months before the contract was adopted, only the retroactive provision was held to be void. Thus an unusually drastic penalty is exacted in this case, for the respondent is ordered to cease and desist from giving effect at its Saginaw plants to the contract of May 16, 1946, in its entirety.