BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 268 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23

    484 U.S. 112 (1987)   Cited 347 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal court has no authority to review a decision of the NLRB's General Counsel dismissing an unfair labor practice complaint pursuant to an informal settlement in which the charging party refused to join
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 880 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
  4. Beverly California Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    227 F.3d 817 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may not probe directly or indirectly into an employee's reasons for supporting a union
  5. Plumbers Pipefitters Local 520 v. N.L.R.B

    955 F.2d 744 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where bargainable subject that would otherwise constitute statutory right under National Labor Relations Act is incorporated into collective bargaining agreement, subject to grievance and arbitration provision, contract supplants statute as source of parties' rights
  6. Mahon v. N.L.R.B

    808 F.2d 1342 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that "it has long been recognized that a union may waive a member's statutorily protected rights" (citing Metro. Edison Co. v. NLRB, 460 U.S. 693, 705, 103 S.Ct. 1467, 75 L.Ed.2d 387 (1983))
  7. Raytheon Company v. N.L.R.B

    326 F.2d 471 (1st Cir. 1964)   Cited 27 times

    No. 6126. Heard November 4, 1963. Decided January 7, 1964. Robert L. Molinar, Lexington, Mass., for petitioner. James C. Paras, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marion L. Griffin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. ALDRICH, Circuit Judge. This case involving a finding