Badlands Golf Course

5 Cited authorities

  1. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."
  2. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them
  3. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year
  4. Lee Lumber and Bldg. Material v. N.L.R.B

    310 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that this court "`review the Board's factual conclusions' only for `substantial evidence,' and must `uphold the Board's application of law to facts unless arbitrary or otherwise erroneous'" (quoting Harter Tomato Products Co. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 934, 937 (D.C. Cir. 1998))
  5. Laborers Intern., Local 872 v. N.L.R.B

    323 F. App'x 523 (9th Cir. 2009)

    No. 07-74872. Argued and Submitted April 14, 2009. Decided April 20, 2009. David A. Rosenfeld, Esq., Weinberg Roger Rosenfeld, Alameda, CA, for Petitioner. Linda Dreeben, Esq., NLRB-National Labor Relations Board Appellate Court Branch, Washington, DC, for Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 28-CA-18753. Before: D.W. NELSON, BERZON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent