§
Armour and Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 881 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  3. Aeronautical Lodge v. Campbell

    337 U.S. 521 (1949)   Cited 95 times
    In Campbell, the Supreme Court held that the Selective Service Act, which required employers to return a veteran to the same position he held prior to entering military service "without loss of seniority" did not render unlawful a clause in the collective-bargaining agreement providing for superseniority for "union chairmen" over veterans in case of layoff.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood

    225 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1955)   Cited 21 times

    No. 15175. August 26, 1955. Frederick U. Reel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Robert H. Hurt, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., for respondent. Albert J. Goldberg, Washington, D.C., filed brief for Central States Drivers Council as amicus curiae. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN, and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. JOHNSEN

  5. National Labor Bd. v. Dallas Gen. Drivers

    228 F.2d 702 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 12 times

    No. 15589. January 17, 1956. Norton J. Come, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert G. Johnson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Houston Clinton, Jr., Mullinax Wells, of Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BORAH and JONES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge. DAWKINS, District Judge. The Board petitions for enforcement of its order against the respondent union

  6. Cathey v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    189 F.2d 428 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 4 times
    In Cathey v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 189 F.2d 428, a petition for enforcement of an order of the Labor Board was denied and the complaint dismissed by the Court of Appeals, where the union concerned had failed to comply with the non-Communist affidavit provisions of the Act.