§

Area Trade Bindery Co.

31-CA-026970 (N.L.R.B. May. 16, 2006)
Area Trade Bindery Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.

    484 U.S. 539 (1988)   Cited 327 times
    Holding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."

  2. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  3. Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    454 U.S. 404 (1982)   Cited 116 times
    Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"

  4. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  5. Huck Mfg. Co. v. NLRB

    693 F.2d 1176 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 29 times
    Finding of no impasse supported by fact that "Union's chief negotiator testified that he never felt the parties were at an impasse"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Powell Elec. Mfg. Co.

    906 F.2d 1007 (5th Cir. 1990)   Cited 15 times
    Finding no impasse where “little substantive bargaining had taken place” during the parties' few negotiation sessions and the union had made proposals that “obviously were grist for the collective bargaining mill”

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WPIX, Inc.

    906 F.2d 898 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 9 times
    Concluding that union's dismissal of employer's proposals as "ridiculous" or a "slap in the face" did not constitute conclusive evidence of impasse, recognizing that "exaggeration, posturing and dilatory tactics . . . might be expected in labor negotiations"