Angelo Moore, Appellant, v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary Department of Veteran Affairs Agency.

8 Cited authorities

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
411 U.S. 792 (1973) Cited 52,827 times 96 Legal Analyses
Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks
509 U.S. 502 (1993) Cited 12,338 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination
Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine
450 U.S. 248 (1981) Cited 20,104 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"
County of Los Angeles v. Davis
440 U.S. 625 (1979) Cited 1,796 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that voluntary cessation can render an issue moot if “there is no reasonable expectation ... that the alleged violation will recur”
Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
409 U.S. 205 (1972) Cited 790 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs not themselves the "direct objects of discrimination" have standing under the FHA
United States v. Heidt
445 F.2d 447 (2d Cir. 1971) Cited 2 times
No. 825, Docket 32709. Argued May 24, 1971. Decided June 18, 1971. Ronald L. Fancher, Asst. U.S. Atty. (H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., U.S. Atty., for W.D. of N.Y., Buffalo, N.Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee. Joseph D. Bermingham, Jr., Esq., Buffalo, N.Y. (Doyle, Diebold Bermingham, Buffalo, N.Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Before KAUFMAN, ANDERSON and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges. Of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, sitting by designation, at time
Section 1614.107 - Dismissals of complaints
29 C.F.R. § 1614.107 Cited 475 times 5 Legal Analyses
Explaining the notice requirements for partial dismissal of claims in an EEO complaint
Section 1614.103 - Complaints of discrimination covered by this part
29 C.F.R. § 1614.103 Cited 210 times 3 Legal Analyses
Stating that complaints of discrimination within the federal government extend to "all employment policies or practices affecting employees or applicants for employment "

Angelo Moore, Appellant, v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary Department of Veteran Affairs Agency.

8 Cited authorities

Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination

Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"

Holding that voluntary cessation can render an issue moot if “there is no reasonable expectation ... that the alleged violation will recur”

Holding that plaintiffs not themselves the "direct objects of discrimination" have standing under the FHA

Explaining the notice requirements for partial dismissal of claims in an EEO complaint

Stating that complaints of discrimination within the federal government extend to "all employment policies or practices affecting employees or applicants for employment "