11 Cited authorities
Gateway Coal Co. v. Mine Workers
414 U.S. 368 (1974) Cited 369 times 1 Legal AnalysesFinding that contractual agreement to submit disagreements to binding arbitration included disputes over safety and thus gave rise to implied obligation not to strike over such disputes
Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board
350 U.S. 270 (1956) Cited 403 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee
415 U.S. 322 (1974) Cited 76 timesIn Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.
N.L.R.B. v. Ridgeway Trucking Co.
622 F.2d 1222 (5th Cir. 1980) Cited 24 timesIn NLRB v. Ridgeway Trucking Co., 622 F.2d 1222, 1223-24 (5th Cir. 1980), we stated that "[t]he test of whether an employee was discharged depends upon the reasonable inferences that the employees could draw from the language used by the employer."
Ramsey v. N.L.R.B
327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir. 1964) Cited 44 timesIn Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003, 84 S.Ct. 1938, 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964), the Seventh Circuit declared that "[t]here is no statutory or constitutional right to be present at an arbitration hearing," rejecting the employee's contention that his rights were denied since he was not given notice of the arbitration hearing and did not appear there. The court specifically noted that the facts showed "that the company fully and adequately defended [the employee's] rights at the hearing."
Gary Hobart Water Corporation v. N.L.R.B
511 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1975) Cited 26 timesIn Gary Hobart, not only was the contract lacking any acknowledgement of the industrial necessity to avoid work stoppages, but the no-strike clause and the grievance and arbitration procedures of the contract were fundamentally related.
Brown Root, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
634 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1981) Cited 11 timesNo. 79-3491. January 19, 1981. Powell, Brown Maverick, William L. Bedman, William A. Brown, Harry M. Thomson, Jr., Houston, Tex., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Diana Orantes Ceresi, Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition to Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, RUBIN and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board found
Teamsters, Chauffeurs Helpers v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 1011 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 22 timesNo. 16415. Argued November 12, 1963. Decided December 5, 1963. Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., also entered an appearance for petitioner. Mr. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., with whom
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. N.L.R.B
418 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1969) Cited 1 timesNo. 23493. September 10, 1969. Arthur J. Schlanger (argued), Boise, Idaho, for petitioner. Herman Levy (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Charles R. Both, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Hugh Hafer and John E. Rinehart, Jr., of Bassett, Donaldson Hafer, Seattle, Wash., for intervenor. Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge Honorable Charles L. Powell, United