§

American Security Programs, Inc.

368 N.L.R.B. 151 (N.L.R.B. 2019)
American Security Programs, Inc.

22 Cited authorities

  1. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 415 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 708 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  4. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.

    327 U.S. 251 (1946)   Cited 983 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when the plaintiff cannot prove his damages by precise computation, the jury "may make a just and reasonable estimate of the damage based on relevant data, and render its verdict accordingly"

  5. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  6. Chicago Typographical v. Chicago Sun-Times

    935 F.2d 1501 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 123 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even where interpretive route is not spelled out or there is an "error in interpretation," the award stands as long as there is a "possible interpretive route to the award"

  7. Wayneview Care Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    664 F.3d 341 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 32 times
    In Wayneview Care Center v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348–50 (D.C.Cir.2011), and Monmouth Care Center v. NLRB, 672 F.3d 1085, 1091–92 (D.C.Cir.2012), we held substantial evidence supported the Board's finding the parties had not reached an impasse in bargaining because in each case the Union had made substantial concessions departing from its initial bargaining position based upon the pattern agreement.

  8. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  9. Truserv Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    254 F.3d 1105 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 19 times
    Holding that an employer "was not free to replace unilaterally the contractual grievance procedure"

  10. Monmouth Care Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    672 F.3d 1085 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 7 times
    Declining to overturn administrative law judge's credibility determination “based on a combination of testimonial demeanor and a lack of specificity and internal corroboration”

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,084 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

  12. Section 6701 - Definitions

    41 U.S.C. § 6701   Cited 52 times   22 Legal Analyses

    In this chapter: (1) COMPENSATION.-The term "compensation" means any of the payments or fringe benefits described in section 6703 of this title. (2) SECRETARY.-The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Labor. (3) SERVICE EMPLOYEE.-The term "service employee"- (A) means an individual engaged in the performance of a contract made by the Federal Government and not exempted under section 6702(b) of this title, whether negotiated or advertised, the principal purpose of which is to furnish services in