American Creosoting Corp.
3 Cited authorities
Regal Knitwear Co. v. Board
324 U.S. 9 (1945) Cited 423 timesHolding "successors and assigns" are liable for contempt if they are properly within the scope of the injunction under Rule 65(d)
Labor Board v. Coca-Cola Bot. Co.
350 U.S. 264 (1956) Cited 50 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Louisville, 1956, 350 U.S. 264, 76 S.Ct. 383, 384, 100 L.Ed. 285, the Supreme Court rejected the attempted distinction as "too thin a dialectic enterprise".
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Coca-Cola Bottling
219 F.2d 441 (6th Cir. 1955) Cited 5 timesNo. 12316. February 15, 1955. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Skaggs, Hays Fahey, Louisville, Ky. (Argued by A. Singleton Cagle, Louisville, Ky., of counsel), for respondent. Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel: And it appearing that respondent at the hearing herein contended that W.B. Taylor, CIO Regional Director for Kentucky, is an officer