AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 1498 (Jefferson Partners L.P.)

11 Cited authorities

Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,623 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
Vaca v. Sipes
386 U.S. 171 (1967) Cited 4,196 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"
Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.
363 U.S. 574 (1960) Cited 5,588 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.
363 U.S. 593 (1960) Cited 3,879 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
499 U.S. 65 (1991) Cited 1,071 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"
Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.
363 U.S. 564 (1960) Cited 2,225 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”
John Wiley Sons v. Livingston
376 U.S. 543 (1964) Cited 1,767 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation
Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
345 U.S. 330 (1953) Cited 880 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts
Gaston v. Teamsters Local 600
614 F.3d 774 (8th Cir. 2010) Cited 11 times
Stating that a showing of bad faith "requires proof of fraud, deceitful action, or dishonest conduct"
Eichelberger v. N.L.R.B
765 F.2d 851 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 29 times
Stating that "`something more'" than negligence must be shown

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 1498 (Jefferson Partners L.P.)

11 Cited authorities

Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”

Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation

Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

Stating that a showing of bad faith "requires proof of fraud, deceitful action, or dishonest conduct"

Stating that "`something more'" than negligence must be shown