§

ALLIED WASTE SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS, LLC D/B/A ALLIED WASTE SERVICES OF FALL RIVER, A/K/A THE FAL

01-CA-123082 (N.L.R.B. Dec. 31, 2014)
ALLIED WASTE SERVICES OF MASSACHUSETTS, LLC D/B/A ALLIED WASTE SERVICES OF FALL RIVER, A/K/A THE FAL

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 314 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.

    102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."

  4. Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    717 F.3d 947 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 26 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the date of filing a document to be published in the Federal Register is the relevant date for determining presence of a quorum

  5. Sec. Exch. Com'n v. Brigadoon Scotch Dist

    480 F.2d 1047 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 95 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In SEC v. Brigadoon Scotch Distributing Co., 480 F.2d 1047, 1052 (2d Cir. 1973), one issue was whether the deletion of a certain phrase from the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77b(1), had withdrawn the warehouse receipts sold by respondents from the category of "securities" subject to SEC regulation. That determination depended on whether the receipts were within the scope of the original statutory language and, if so, what the intent of Congress had been in deleting that part of the definition.

  6. National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro

    81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"