§

Allied Medical Transport, Inc.

360 N.L.R.B. 1264 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Allied Medical Transport, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 650 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Bus Transit

    577 F.3d 467 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 16 times
    Interpreting similar language in 29 C.F.R. § 101.10 as meaning "that the Board's procedures are to be controlled by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as far as practicable" (cleaned up)

  5. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  6. Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    301 F.3d 167 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding unlawful polling when employees were solicited to appear in an anti-union film

  7. Palace Sports Entm't, Inc. v. NLRB

    411 F.3d 212 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 6 times

    No. 04-1261, 04-1276. Argued March 18, 2005. Decided May 31, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Robert M. Vercruysse argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Gary S. Fealk. David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Assistant General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Homer D. Bronson Co.

    273 F. App'x 32 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 1 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 07-2447-ag. April 10, 2008. Application of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its Order, dated March 16, 2007, against Homer D. Bronson Company. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the application is GRANTED. Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, Ruth E. Burdick, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, (Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Five Star

    278 F. App'x 697 (8th Cir. 2008)

    No. 07-1536. Submitted: May 15, 2008. Filed: May 20, 2008. Petition from the United States National Labor Relations Board. Linda Dreeben, Assistant General Counsel, Richard Alan Cohen, Senior Attorney, Robert James Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, National Labor Relations Board Headquarters, Region 5 Resident Office, Washington, DC, D. Michael McConnell, National Labor Relations Board, Overland Park, KS, for Petitioner. Jason N. Shaffer, Springfield, MO, for Respondent. Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and

  10. RHI HOLDINGS v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE

    47 F.3d 1161 (3d Cir. 1995)   Cited 1 times

    No. 94-1592. January 4, 1995. Appeal from the E.D.Pa., Yohn, J. AFFIRMED.

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,304 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355