§

Allied Mechanical

356 N.L.R.B. 164 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
Allied Mechanical

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 650 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. United Steel v. National Labor

    321 F. App'x 581 (9th Cir. 2009)

    No. 07-72381. Argued and Submitted March 10, 2009. Filed April 1, 2009. Patrick W. Jordan, Esq., Jordan Law Group, San Rafael, CA, Jeffrey B. Demain, Esq., Altshuler Berzon LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner. Linda Dreeben, Esq., Meredith L. Jason, Heather S. Beard, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board Appellate Court Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor