§

Albertson's/Max Food Warehouse

329 N.L.R.B. 410 (N.L.R.B. 1999)
Albertson's/Max Food Warehouse

5 Cited authorities

  1. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 277 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

  2. Retail Clerks v. Schermerhorn

    375 U.S. 96 (1963)   Cited 368 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he purpose of Congress is the ultimate touchstone" of preemption analysis

  3. Algoma Plywood Co. v. Wis. Board

    336 U.S. 301 (1949)   Cited 114 times
    In Algoma P. V. Co. v. Wisconsin Empl. Rel. Bd., 336 U.S. 301, it was held that nothing in the Act precludes a state from prohibiting closed-shop contracts in whole or in part.

  4. Nielsen v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 2569

    94 F.3d 1107 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 13 times
    Upholding the facial validity of an unqualified union security clause

  5. Section 8-3-108 - What are unfair labor practices

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-3-108   Cited 8 times

    (1) It is an unfair labor practice for an employer, individually or in concert with others, to: (a) Interfere with, restrain, or coerce his employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 8-3-106; (b) Initiate, create, dominate, or interfere with the formation or administration of any labor organization or contribute financial support to it; except that an employer shall not be prohibited from reimbursing employees at their prevailing wage rate for time spent conferring with him, nor