§

AIM Aerospace Sumner, Inc.

367 NLRB No. 148 (N.L.R.B. 2019)
AIM Aerospace Sumner, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

    502 U.S. 814 (1991)   Cited 78 times

    No. 90-1805. October 7, 1991, OCTOBER TERM, 1991. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 924 F. 2d 539.

  4. V & S ProGalv, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    168 F.3d 270 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 19 times
    Finding that a bargaining order "was the proper remedy where the Board found several violations of § 8 and, as such, the likelihood of ensuring a fair election was slight"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Vemco, Inc.

    989 F.2d 1468 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that an employer's statement that unionization would result in a work shortage resulting in reduced hours or layoffs was a permissible, objective prediction, and thus protected speech under § 8(c), where nothing suggested that the expected work shortage "was within [the employer's] control" or that the employer "would implement a cutback in hours or a layoff solely on its own initiative for reasons unrelated to the economic necessity of adjusting to a shortage of work"

  6. SFO Good-Nite Inn, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    700 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 3 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 11–1295 11–1325. 2012-11-20 SFO GOOD–NITE INN, LLC, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Patrick W. Jordan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Nanette Joslyn. MacKenzie Fillow, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben,

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Miller Waste Mills

    315 F.3d 951 (8th Cir. 2003)   Cited 8 times

    No. 01-3073. Submitted: October 7, 2002. Filed: January 10, 2003. David A. Seid, argued, Washington, DC (Sharon I. Block, Arthur F. Rosenfeld, John E. Higgins, Jr., John H. Ferguson, Aileen A. Armstrong, on the brief), for petitioner. Lee A. Lastovich, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Paul J. Zech, on the brief), for respondent. Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board petitions this court to enforce its order

  8. Ron Tirapelli Ford, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    987 F.2d 433 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 15 times
    Finding in an incumbent union context that "a bargaining order is the appropriate remedy to return the parties to the status quo ante"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Rain-Ware, Inc.

    732 F.2d 1349 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs," where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition

  10. Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    644 F.2d 834 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    In Golden Day Schools, 644 F.2d 834, the court noted that although the child care workers' leaflet to parents included harsh language and serious charges about the care of the children, it fell "woefully short of the malicious tone" that would justify a discharge under Jefferson Standard. Appellant correctly points out that the court in Golden Day Schools determined that the leaflet played no part in the discharge of the employees.