§

ADB Utility Contractors, Inc.

355 N.L.R.B. 1020 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
ADB Utility Contractors, Inc.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  3. United States v. Cote

    51 F.3d 178 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the law of the case doctrine only applies "when the issue in question was actually considered and decided"

  4. Labor Board v. Donnelly Co.

    330 U.S. 219 (1947)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that a hearing examiner's prior adverse ruling did not prevent him from adjudicating the same case on retrial even though the examiner's initial decision had been reversed for improper exclusion of evidence

  5. Exxon Chemical Patents v. Lubrizol Corp.

    137 F.3d 1475 (Fed. Cir. 1998)   Cited 56 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the scope of the judgment appealed from, limited to literal infringement, did not preclude adjudication of infringement by the doctrine of equivalents

  6. Luckey v. Miller

    929 F.2d 618 (11th Cir. 1991)   Cited 44 times
    Noting that the doctrine “does not bar consideration of matters that could have been, but were not, resolved in earlier proceedings”

  7. Power Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    40 F.3d 409 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that coincident timing and uncontested § 8 violations was sufficient evidence to support Board's finding

  8. Gregory v. Popeyes

    857 F.2d 1474 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 33 times

    No. 87-1461. September 9, 1988. Appeal from the E.D.Mich. AFFIRMED.

  9. Garvey Marine, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    245 F.3d 819 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 7 times
    Upholding Board's decision to enforce bargaining order despite significant turnover among employees after order was issued

  10. In re Labor Board

    304 U.S. 486 (1938)   Cited 32 times

    PETITION FOR WRITS OF PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS. No. 21, Original. Argued May 23, 1938. Decided May 31, 1938. 1. To confer jurisdiction upon the Circuit Court of Appeals to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board, the filing and service of the petition are not enough, but a transcript of the Board's proceedings also must be filed with the court. National Labor Relations Act, § 10(d)(e)(f). P. 491. 2. Where a petition for review has been filed and served on the Board, and the petitioner