§

Ace Tank and Heater Co.

167 N.L.R.B. 663 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Ace Tank and Heater Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949)   Cited 156 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"

  2. W.W. Cross Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    174 F.2d 875 (1st Cir. 1949)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that " 'wages' " in the NLRA "embraces within its meaning direct and immediate economic benefits flowing from the employment relationship covers a group insurance program"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

    366 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 23 times

    No. 19448. September 30, 1966. Melvin J. Welles, Paul Elkind, Robert B. Schwartz, Attys., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and COX, District Judge. William Harold Cox, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: We hope that this opinion proves

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Rice Lake Creamery Company

    365 F.2d 888 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 15 times
    Following Mastro Plastics

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Celotex Corporation

    364 F.2d 552 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 13 times
    In Celotex, for example, the court enforced a Board order finding that an employer had pleaded inability to pay when it insisted that concessions were necessary to make its "plant competitive and to insure that plant's survival," 364 F.2d at 553 (emphasis added), and not solely on the basis of a claim of competitive disadvantage. Indeed, the trial examiner found that the bargaining between the parties had taken place in the context of what wage rate the plant " could afford."

  6. Quality Castings Company v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 36 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 6 times

    No. 15223. December 7, 1963. Charles R. Iden, Akron, Ohio, Brouse, McDowell, May, Bierce Wortman, Akron, Ohio, on brief, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Allen I. Mendelsohn, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Before O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and KALBFLEISCH and PECK, District Judges. KALBFLEISCH, District Judge. The Quality Castings

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Deena Artware

    228 F.2d 871 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 8 times

    No. 11156. December 16, 1955. Geo. J. Bott, Former General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James G. Wheeler, Paducah, Ky., for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This Court having on July 30, 1952, handed down its decision enforcing an order of the National Labor Relations Board, which directed, among other things, that the respondent, Deena Artware, Incorporated, Paducah, Kentucky, its officers, agents, successors and assigns