300 Exhibit Services & Events, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Haberman Const. Co.

    641 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that the employer "manifested an intent to abide by the . . . contract by enjoying its benefits and abiding by its provisions"
  2. Local Joint Exec. Bd. v. National Labor rel

    515 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 8 times

    No. 05-75515. Argued and Submitted October 16, 2007. Filed January 28, 2008. Kristin Martin (argued), Richard G. McCracken, Davis, Cowell, Bowe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. Brian Herman (argued), Mark J. Ricciardi, Fisher Phillips, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for intervenor Reorganized Aladdin Gaming, LLC. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Donkin's Inn, Inc.

    532 F.2d 138 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 41 times

    No. 74-3252. March 4, 1976. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1976. Edmund Cooke, Atty. (argued), NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert S. Rose (argued), of Harris Aranda, Marina Del Rey, Cal., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS, TRASK and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. OPINION TRASK, Circuit Judge: This is an application for Enforcement of an Order of the NLRB, issued on October 9, 1974, against Donkin's Inn, Inc. (hereafter, "the Company") for certain violations of sections 8(a)(5) and 8(a)(1) of the

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Oklahoma Installation Co.

    219 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 2 times
    Concluding that the contract language at issue did not clearly express the parties' intent, without addressing actual employee support
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Morse Shoe, Inc.

    591 F.2d 542 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 4 times

    No. 77-3313. February 22, 1979. William R. Stewart (argued), Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Madeline Balk (argued), Seligman Seligman, New York City, for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge. Honorable William H. Orrick, Jr., United States District Judge, Northern District of California, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board ("Board")

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second